<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pro-rata calculations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.thesalarycalculator.co.uk/paye/pro-rata-calculations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.thesalarycalculator.co.uk/paye/pro-rata-calculations/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Blogging on personal finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:23:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tracey Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://blog.thesalarycalculator.co.uk/paye/pro-rata-calculations/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracey Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thesalarycalculator.co.uk/?p=41#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the explanation.

I did challenge them about the tax and they then told me I had to complete a P46, in order for them to obtain a correct tax code for me and get me off BR.

I had given them a P45 from my previous temp role which had had a BR tax code with it (because I had one and because I thought P45s were preferable over P46s!) but I hadn&#039;t noticed the deduction as much because that role was weekly paid. For the last seven years I have also worked on and off for a nurse &#039;bank&#039; for which I have a proper tax code - I don&#039;t see why I can&#039;t pass that on to this current employer, but apparently each new job needs a new tax code!

(I&#039;ve only been working nineteen years, like!)

I know for a fact my name is mud with the inland revenue with all my temp roles because they as much as said they&#039;re fed up with giving me rebates!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the explanation.</p>
<p>I did challenge them about the tax and they then told me I had to complete a P46, in order for them to obtain a correct tax code for me and get me off BR.</p>
<p>I had given them a P45 from my previous temp role which had had a BR tax code with it (because I had one and because I thought P45s were preferable over P46s!) but I hadn&#8217;t noticed the deduction as much because that role was weekly paid. For the last seven years I have also worked on and off for a nurse &#8216;bank&#8217; for which I have a proper tax code &#8211; I don&#8217;t see why I can&#8217;t pass that on to this current employer, but apparently each new job needs a new tax code!</p>
<p>(I&#8217;ve only been working nineteen years, like!)</p>
<p>I know for a fact my name is mud with the inland revenue with all my temp roles because they as much as said they&#8217;re fed up with giving me rebates!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://blog.thesalarycalculator.co.uk/paye/pro-rata-calculations/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thesalarycalculator.co.uk/?p=41#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Hi Tracey,

I think there are two things going on here, firstly a comparison of weekly and monthly, and secondly the tax your employer has taken off you.

First thing is to note is that a month is not exactly 4 weeks. 4 weeks would be 28 days, not 30 or 31 - so the monthly value is more than 4 times the weekly value. In fact, the calculator divides the annual figures by 12 to give the monthly figures, and by 52 for the weekly figures. So that&#039;s why 4 times £315 is not £1,365

Secondly, it seems to me that you have been charged too much tax. If you are new to the job, they may have used &quot;emergency tax&quot;, where they don&#039;t know your tax code. Without your tax code, they can&#039;t give you your personal tax-free allowance, so they have taxed all of your income. I&#039;m sure they will clarify this with you - most employers will correct this for your next payslip, and may even refund you the overcharged amount (so next month might be more than you expect!).

I hope this helps, and as always your employer should be able to explain your payslip to you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tracey,</p>
<p>I think there are two things going on here, firstly a comparison of weekly and monthly, and secondly the tax your employer has taken off you.</p>
<p>First thing is to note is that a month is not exactly 4 weeks. 4 weeks would be 28 days, not 30 or 31 &#8211; so the monthly value is more than 4 times the weekly value. In fact, the calculator divides the annual figures by 12 to give the monthly figures, and by 52 for the weekly figures. So that&#8217;s why 4 times £315 is not £1,365</p>
<p>Secondly, it seems to me that you have been charged too much tax. If you are new to the job, they may have used &#8220;emergency tax&#8221;, where they don&#8217;t know your tax code. Without your tax code, they can&#8217;t give you your personal tax-free allowance, so they have taxed all of your income. I&#8217;m sure they will clarify this with you &#8211; most employers will correct this for your next payslip, and may even refund you the overcharged amount (so next month might be more than you expect!).</p>
<p>I hope this helps, and as always your employer should be able to explain your payslip to you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracey Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://blog.thesalarycalculator.co.uk/paye/pro-rata-calculations/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracey Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 11:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thesalarycalculator.co.uk/?p=41#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Sorry, are you sure your calculations are right?! Your weekly figures seem right but not your monthly ones.

I work a temporary job for £10.50 per hour for 30 hours a week with no sick pay and holiday pay pro rata. I got a monthly pay slip this week based on 4 weeks, and my gross pay was £1181.25 because I had to drop one day, so for that week I was paid £236.25. They deducted £314.06, £77.66 for NI and £236.40. I walked away with a minty £867.19 which I&#039;m not at all happy with. Was that 20% BR tax?

But for four weeks at £315 per week, which is correct, I should get £1260 gross - not £1365 as you suggest, surely? So have they overcharged my NI? I&#039;ve queried it with them, quoting the figures I got from your site, but now I&#039;m wondering because your monthly figures seem way off. What else are you taking into consideration there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, are you sure your calculations are right?! Your weekly figures seem right but not your monthly ones.</p>
<p>I work a temporary job for £10.50 per hour for 30 hours a week with no sick pay and holiday pay pro rata. I got a monthly pay slip this week based on 4 weeks, and my gross pay was £1181.25 because I had to drop one day, so for that week I was paid £236.25. They deducted £314.06, £77.66 for NI and £236.40. I walked away with a minty £867.19 which I&#8217;m not at all happy with. Was that 20% BR tax?</p>
<p>But for four weeks at £315 per week, which is correct, I should get £1260 gross &#8211; not £1365 as you suggest, surely? So have they overcharged my NI? I&#8217;ve queried it with them, quoting the figures I got from your site, but now I&#8217;m wondering because your monthly figures seem way off. What else are you taking into consideration there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
