hybrid
The working from home debate
Back in 2020, as the Covid-19 virus took hold of the world, working from home became compulsory for those who were able to do so. And so, for many, came the rise of endless Zoom calls and Teams meetings, virtual social lunches, much more time at home, and fewer hours commuting.
However, as the world has slowly gained back control over the virus, WFH has endured in many workplaces. That said, the majority of people still never work from home (63.9%), 21.4% work in a hybrid model, and only 7.8% of workers permanently work from home.
Yet, despite the above figures, and many who choose to work from home touting the benefits of doing so, recently Chancellor Jeremy Hunt, speaking at the British Chambers of Commerce conference, said workers should return to the office unless they had a “good reason not to.” One of the main reasons he cited included that WFH stifles creativity.
So, what’s the basis behind his argument, is there any truth in it, and what does the workforce think? In this week’s article at The Salary Calculator, we’ll walk you through:
- The statistics on productivity,
- How creativity is faring at home versus the office,
- How WFH impacts mental health and relationship building,
- What workers’ preferences are.
Variability in productivity
When it comes to productivity and WFH, depending on who you talk to or which sources you scan through, you’ll get a very different picture painted. For example, a study conducted by Stanford, which surveyed 16,000 workers over a nine-month period, found that for those working from home, their productivity was boosted by around 13%. A few contributing factors included having a quieter and more convenient place to work in and working more due to fewer breaks. Further, it wasn’t just productivity that was boosted; workers also said they felt more satisfied, and attrition rates were even cut by half.
This is supplemented by research from TechTalk which found that 55% of the 2,000 work professionals it surveyed concentrated better when working from home. Similarly, Gitlab found that 4 in 5 workers would recommend remote working to a friend, and 81% of people surveyed felt satisfied with remote working.
That being said, while individual productivity might be thriving in some cases, surveys show that teamwork isn’t faring so well. Gitlab, for example, found that only 37% said the organisation they work for does a” good job” of aligning work across projects.
Creativity in the workplace versus WFH
One of the main reasons Hunt has cited for a return to the office is his concern about creativity or lack thereof. However, while there is no definitive data, some research shows that employees can be just as creative, if not more so when working from home. Research from Better Up found that people were 56% more creative and thought more innovatively when working remotely.
Some of the reasons that the research team gave for explaining these results were that long commutes and excessive meetings, more time being alone and thoughtful, and being in a place of safety and strength contributed to more creativity. However, there are two sides to this, and research published in Nature on a field experiment across five countries actually found that more video-conferencing, something more prevalent in remote working, in fact, inhibit the production of creative ideas. Indeed, some workers are worried about this, with around 18% concerned about their creative output outside the office.
One of the common arguments regarding this is that without being in the office, workers don’t have the opportunity to bounce ideas off each other or spark up conversations that lead them down the road of innovation. There are no so-called “water cooler moments.” However, it really comes down to an individual’s working style.
Mental health and relationship building
A core issue often explored when discussing the WFH dynamic is how it affects mental health, well-being and relationships. Again, as with all of these areas, there’s a huge level of variability.
That said, isolation is often a common concern for those working from home. One study found that 81% of younger workers said they would feel more isolated solely working from home, while another study found that 60% of workers felt less connected to colleagues.
Further, many workplaces appear to be failing to provide their employees with additional resources to cope with these new challenges. In fact, one study found that under 30% (29%) are doing so. At the same time, around 19% of workers like WFH because it allows them to avoid office politics.
It’s not just work relationships that can be negatively impacted by working from home, though, according to experts, it can also put a strain on home relationships, for example, with a partner. This is often put down to being “physically present” but “unavailable” or due to letting work seep into home life.
Linked with this is the question of work-life balance. Living and working in the same space can make switching off difficult, with a reported 32% of workers finding it difficult to do so. This is especially true for those working in their bedrooms (17%) and living rooms (27%). Working in the former can also be bad for productivity and negatively affect workers’ ability to sleep. According to Hubble research, Gen Z reportedly struggles with this the most.
What are workers’ preferences, and what does the future hold?
So, all things considered, what are workers’ preferences? Do people enjoy WFH, hybrid or office-based working? Well, a wide range of contributing factors affect this, and it appears that age group also has a part to play.
According to Deloitte, 77% of Gen Zs and 71% of Millennials would consider looking for a new job if told they had to return to the office full-time. Meanwhile, another piece of research found that two-thirds (66 per cent) of workers aged over 55 years old prefer hybrid working.
Elsewhere, a study by Hubble found that, interestingly, Gen Z were the most “pro-office” group, while Gen X and Baby Boomers were more “pro-WFH.”
It’s likely that preferences will also depend on whether or not workers have young children; after all, WFH allows much more flexible scheduling (perceived as the main benefit for 50% of workers). Likewise, another factor is how far away a worker lives from their place of work; lack of commute is the secondary draw to WFH for 43% of respondents after flexible scheduling – this comes with big savings, too, a draw for 33% of people.
While the research shows that different groups might prefer different models of working, a key insight from research in this area is that workers like flexibility and the option to choose where and how they work.
Looking ahead, while the likes of Hunt may consider WFH to be detrimental to employees’ performance, it looks like it won’t be going anywhere anytime soon. Moreover, leaked Labour policy documents reveal that the party is even planning to make flexible working a legal right. So, watch this space.
None of the content on this website, including blog posts, comments, or responses to user comments, is offered as financial advice. Figures used are for illustrative purposes only.
Categories
Tags
-
50% tax
2022
April 2010
April 2011
April 2012
budget
coronavirus
cost of living crisis
covid-19
debt
dollar
economics
Economy
election
Employed and Self Employed
Foreign Currency
foreign exchange rates
HMRC
holiday
holiday money
house prices
houses
income tax
interest rates
Jobs
Loans
Mortgages
national insurance
Pay As You Earn
pension
Pensions
personal allowance
pound
recession
recovery
savings
Self Assessment
self employed
self employment
student loans
tax rates
The Salary Calculator
unemployment
us
VAT
Sponsored Links
Archive
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- November 2019
- September 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- December 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- January 2018
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- September 2016
- June 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- June 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- October 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009